Briefing
The DoW Digital Standards Strategy: What It Means for Technical Manuals
What Was Published
A Strategy for Standards Software Can Use
The Department of War Digital Standards Strategy is dated January 2026 and was announced by the Defense Standardization Program Office on 12 January. It is 36 pages, publicly releasable, and signed by the Defense Standardization Executive. Its subject is the standardization documents themselves: specifications, standards, and data item descriptions, the requirements that technical manual contracts are built on.
Its conclusion is blunt: “Providing requirements in human-readable formats will not suffice in a model-based ecosystem environment.” The strategy ties itself to the Department's digital engineering policy, DoD Instruction 5000.97, and calls digital standards key artifacts within that ecosystem.
The Scale
Paper, PDF, XML, and Beyond
The strategy's first figure, “Evolution of Standards,” lays out five stages from past to future, each indicating how far a standard can be read and acted on by a machine:
- Paper and PDF
- Where standards came from. The strategy notes the Department moved to PDF documents in the 1990s; both are human-readable only.
- XML
- The first machine-readable step, and the format the Department has chosen "because it is a ubiquitous machine-readable format."
- Machine-readable content
- "Structured content that can be recognized and validated by software," such as XML, CSV, or JSON.
- Machine-interpretable content
- "Semantic content that can be acted upon by software," such as SysML models or CAD. This is where the figure points next.
The strategy also notes that human-readable documents can often be generated automatically from machine-readable and machine-interpretable formats. That is the same idea structured technical publishing is built on: the structured source is the record, and the readable document is an output.
The Plan
Five Lines of Effort
- 1. Collaboration and coordination
- Working across the Department, other government forums, and standards development organizations to find needs, use cases, pilots, and best practices.
- 2. Converting human-readable to machine-readable content
- Converting existing defense standardization documents to XML, "starting with defense standards and specifications," with templates and style sheets for publishing in ASSIST.
- 3. Transition to machine-interpretable content
- The use and reuse of digital standards in other formats, such as models.
- 4. Establish the ecosystem
- Native creation, governance, and configuration management of digital standards, tied to modernizing ASSIST, including automated checks of digital standards against the formatting standards MIL-STD-961 and MIL-STD-962.
- 5. Workforce development
- Training for the activities that manage standards, and updates to existing acquisition coursework.
Some of this already exists. The strategy names DI-SESS-82426, published in October 2023, as the first machine-readable standardization product in ASSIST, and describes pilots ranging from a JSON model of MIL-STD-882E to model-based standards for additive manufacturing. What it does not contain is a schedule: a roadmap is still to be written, and the guidance says it is not intended to be prescriptive.
Technical Manuals
Where Manuals Fit
Technical manuals appear once, in an appendix describing Army practice, and the passage is telling. The Army has been converting technical manuals from PDF to XML with style sheets and templates, and its publishing regulations already require XML data for new and revised technical manuals, built to MIL-STD-40051 or to the Army's S1000D business rules in MIL-STD-3031.
Our read: manuals are the downstream end of the same scale. A program that still delivers manuals as page-built PDFs is two steps behind the picture the Department now draws for its own standards. And as the requirements become machine-readable, checking deliverables against them becomes automatable, the way a BREX already lets an S1000D program check every data module against its business rules. The strategy does not say this; it is where the logic leads.
What to Do
Five Steps for Publications Teams
- Place your library on the same scale the strategy draws: paper, PDF, XML, machine-readable, machine-interpretable. Most technical manual libraries are still at the second step.
- Author in a structured model (MIL-STD-40051, MIL-STD-3031, or S1000D) rather than in page layout, so the PDF is an output, not the source.
- Treat style and format rules as checkable data. S1000D does this with the BREX; MIL-STD-40051 work packages validate against their DTDs.
- Keep metadata in the source (applicability, distribution statements, revision history), because machine-readable requirements will eventually be checked against machine-readable deliverables.
- Watch ASSIST for XML editions of the standards your contracts cite, and for machine-readable data item descriptions.
The same direction runs through the Department's other data work: the MIL-STD-31000 technical data package appears in the strategy as its example of CAD-based, machine-interpretable content, and our piece on model-based technical data covers what that means for manuals.
FAQ
Questions We Hear
What is the DoW Digital Standards Strategy?
A strategy from the Defense Standardization Program Office, dated January 2026 and announced on 12 January, for moving defense standardization documents (specifications, standards, and data item descriptions) from human-readable formats to machine-readable and machine-interpretable ones. It sets three guiding principles and five lines of effort toward what it calls a fully integrated digital ecosystem.
What is the difference between machine-readable and machine-interpretable?
In the strategy's terms, machine-readable content is structured content that software can recognize and validate, such as XML, CSV, or JSON. Machine-interpretable content is semantic content that software can act on, such as SysML models or CAD. A PDF is neither: a person can read it, but software cannot reliably use what it says.
Will MIL-STDs be published in XML?
That is the plan. The strategy describes converting existing standardization documents to XML, starting with defense standards and specifications, with templates and style sheets for publishing in ASSIST, and says machine-readable content will remain exportable as PDF. It sets no target dates; a roadmap is still to be developed.
Does the Digital Standards Strategy apply to technical manuals?
Not directly: it governs standardization documents, not the manuals contractors deliver. But it describes the Army's existing practice of converting technical manuals from PDF to XML, and notes that Army policy already requires XML data for new and revised technical manuals built to MIL-STD-40051 or MIL-STD-3031.
Get In Touch
Moving Manuals Off PDF?
We convert legacy technical manuals into MIL-STD-40051 and S1000D, set up the rules that check them, and deliver the output wherever your readers need it.